MICHAEL N. SCHNEIDER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES DARRELL MABE, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida First District Court of Appeal reversed a summary judgment entered against the personal representative of a decedent's estate in a tort action arising from allegedly wrongful conduct by a Jacksonville Sheriff's Office detective. The trial court erred by failing to apply the correct summary judgment standard and by relying on inadmissible deposition testimony, necessitating reversal and remand for trial.
The trial court erred in granting summary judgment because it failed to apply the correct summary judgment standard, relied in part on inadmissible deposition testimony not based on personal knowledge, and failed to resolve all reasonable inferences in favor of the non-moving party. Material issues of fact precluded summary judgment on either count.
[1] Summary judgment is improper when the evidence raises any issue of material fact, is conflicting, permits different reasonable inferences, or tends to prove the issues.
[2] A party moving for summary judgment must conclusively demonstrate the absence of any genuine issue of material fact.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A party moving for summary judgment must show conclusively the absence of any genuine issue of material fact and the court must draw every possible inference in favor of the party against whom a summary judgment is sought.”
Establishes the fundamental standard for summary judgment that the trial court failed to apply
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJames Darrell Mabe died as a result of allegedly tortious conduct by Detective Larry Branch of the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office. Michael N. Schneider…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Personal Knowledge cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of a summary final judgment entered against him, as personal representative of the estate of James Darrell Mabe, in his action seeking damages resulting from the death of Mabe which was caused by allegedly tortious conduct by Detective Larry Branch of the Jacksonville Sheriffs Office. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that appellee failed to carry its burden of demonstrating conclusively either the absence of any genuine issue as to any material fact or entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we reverse.
As the courts of this state have said many times, the law regarding summary judgment is well-established:
[A] party moving for summary judgment must show conclusively the absence of any genuine issue of material fact and the court must draw every possible inference in favor of the party against whom a summary judgment is sought.... A summary judgment should not be granted unless the facts are so crystallized that nothing remains but questions of law....
If the evidence raises any issue of material fact, if it is conflicting, if it will permit different reasonable inferences, or if it tends to prove the issues, it should be submitted to the jury as a question of fact to be determined by it.
Moore v. Morris, 475 So. 2d 666, 668 (Fla. 1985) (citations omitted). Succinctly put, “[w]hen acting upon a motion for summary judgment, if the record raises the slightest doubt that material issues could be present, that doubt must be resolved against the movant and the motion for summary judgment must be denied.” Jones v. Directors Guild of Am., Inc., 584 So. 2d 1057, 1059 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (citations omitted).
In this case, it appears that the trial court failed to heed this well-established law and, in addition, relied in part on deposition testimony that was not based on personal knowledge and would not be admissible in evidence at trial. Applying the correct law, and viewing all reasonable inferences which may be drawn from the evidence in a light most favorable to appellant, we are unable to say that the record conclusively demonstrates either the absence of any genuine issue of material fact or that appellee is entitled to judgment as a matter of law as to either count of the amended complaint. Accordingly, we reverse the summary final judgment, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.
KAHN, C.J. and WEBSTER, J., concur; HAWKES, J. concurs in result.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thomas v. Eckerd Drugs and AIG, 987 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
-
Smith v. Time Customer Servs. & Travelers, 132 So. 3d 841 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…trast, the evidence is conflicting, and will permit different reasonable inferences, or tends to prove the issues, it should be submitted to the trier of fact. See Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P., 760 So. 2d at 130; Schneider v. City of Jacksonville, 933 So. 2d 601, 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). This court has explained that summary final orders are permitted where res judicata bars the claim: Florida Administrative Code Rule 60Q-6.120(1) permits a JCC to enter a summary final order when the order would be dispos…
Authorities Cited
- Moore v. Morris, 475 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 1985)
- Jones v. Directors Guild OF Am., Inc., 584 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)