INTCOMEX HOLDINGS, LLC, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
GRANT THORNTON INTERNATIONAL, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
INTCOMEX HOLDINGS, LLC, ETC., APPELLANT,
GRANT THORNTON INTERNATIONAL, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
933 So. 2d 1155
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 54 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We find that the trial court’s decision to dismiss Appellant’s second amended complaint for forum non conveniens did not constitute a “clear abuse of discretion.” See Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235, 257, 102 S.Ct. 252, 70 L.Ed.2d 419 (1981). “[W]here the [trial] court has considered all relevant public and private interest factors, and where its balancing of these factors is reasonable, its decision deserves substantial deference.” Id.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (28 total)
-
Martinez v. State, 981 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2008)…PER CURIAM. Petitioner Eric Martinez seeks review of the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Martinez v. State, 933 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicts with decisions of the First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth District Courts of Appeal on a question of law. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. FACTS AND PRO…
-
Zamir Garzon v. State, 980 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 2008)…r” in written instructions, addressing nonfundamental error); Davis, 922 So. 2d 279 (use of "and/or” with principals instruction); Harris v. State, 937 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (use of "and/or” with codefendants instruction); Martinez v. State, 933 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (use of "and/or” in underlying forcible felony instruction held not fundamental error because not [*1043] used as to a disputed issue); Tolbert v. State, 922 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (use of “and/or” found not fundamental e…
-
Hendricks v. State, 34 So. 3d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…ate, 743 So. 2d 501, 505 (Fla.1999)). Moreover, error is fundamental only if it “goes to the very heart of the judicial process” and “extinguishes a party’s right to a fair trial,” such that it results in a miscarriage of justice. Martinez v. State, 933 So. 2d 1155, 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). The Florida Supreme Court has cautioned that “[t]he doctrine of fundamental error should be applied only in rare cases where a jurisdictional error appears or where the interests of justice present a compelling demand for…
Previewing 3 of 28 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235 (U.S. 1981)