JAMES C. PEACOCK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VILLANTI, Judge.
James C. Peacock appeals the postcon-viction court’s denial of his pro se motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The postconviction court denied the motion as successive because Peacock had previously filed a rule 3.850 motion, which it denied in part and dismissed in part on February 24, 2005, after an evidentiary hearing. Peacock’s appeal of the postcon-viction court’s February 24, 2005, order is pending in this court in case number 2D05-1984.
The postconviction court did not have jurisdiction to rule on Peacock’s second rule 3.850 motion because the claims raised therein were identical to claims currently under consideration in this court. See Tellas v. State, 811 So. 2d 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Therefore, we reverse the postconviction court’s order denying Peacock’s rule 3.850 motion and remand for entry of an order of dismissal.
Reversed and remanded.
CASANEUVA and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jachimski v. State, 162 So. 3d 302 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…ady been done — consider Ms. Jachimski’s petition for determination of indigency. If the motion is denied, the circuit court or its clerk shall enter a written order explaining its reasons for the denial. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.430; Stanley v. Berry, 933 So. 2d 1219, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (noting the circuit court’s compliance with rule 9.430 by providing written reasons for its denial of the appellant’s motion for order of insolvency); cf. Drayton v. Moore, 807 So. 2d 819, 823 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (reversing…
Authorities Cited
- City OF Miami v. Quik Cash Jewelry & Pawn, Inc., 811 So. 2d 756 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
- Bennie Frank Tellas v. State, 811 So. 2d 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)