COSTA CROCIERE, S.P.A., PRESTIGE CRUISES N.V., CRUISE SHIPS CATERING AND SERVICES, INTERNATIONAL N.V., COSTA CRUISE LINES N.V., L.L.C., COSTA CRUISE LINES, INC., AND CARNIVAL CORPORATION D/B/A CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, APPELLANTS,
v.
RICARDO ESCOBAR, APPELLEE
COSTA CROCIERE, S.P.A., PRESTIGE CRUISES N.V., CRUISE SHIPS CATERING AND SERVICES, INTERNATIONAL N.V., COSTA CRUISE LINES N.V., L.L.C., COSTA CRUISE LINES, INC., AND CARNIVAL CORPORATION D/B/A CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, APPELLANTS,
RICARDO ESCOBAR, APPELLEE
934 So. 2d 510
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.061(g); Wedge Hotel Mgmt., (Bahamas), Ltd. v. Meier, 868 So. 2d 552, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)(‘Wedge’s motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens was not filed until May 6, 2002, well past the sixty day time limit of 1.061(g). As Wedge’s motion was untimely under the plain language of 1.061(g), we need not address the merits of the arguments raised in the motion.”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Giovanna Settimi Caraffa v. Carnival Corp., 34 So. 3d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…affirmed the denial of a motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens. We declined to address the merits of the motion because the “motion was untimely under the plain language of rule 1.061(g). Id. at 552. See also Costa Crociere, S.P.A. v. Escobar, 934 So. 2d 510, 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (declining to address the merits because the motion was untimely filed); Dawson Ins., Inc. v. Quantum Capital Network, LLC, 923 So. 2d 1194, 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (affirming the denial of a motion to dismiss because it was…
Authorities Cited
- Wedge Hotel Mgmt. v. Meier, 868 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)