GREGORY L. DUMAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GREGORY L. DUMAS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
935 So. 2d 66
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Scott v. Dugger, 634 So. 2d 1062 (Fla.1993); Hough v. State, 679 So. 2d 1300 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
PLEUS, C.J., GRIFFIN and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Pruitt, 977 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…not properly be considered on a motion to dismiss. The State is therefore barred from arguing these points for the first time on appeal. See § 924.061(l)(b), (3), Fla. Stat. (2006); F.B. v. State, 852 So. 2d 226, 229 (Fla.2003); State v. Szempruch, 935 So. 2d 66, 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, C.J., and SALCINES and CANADY, JJ., Concur.…
-
State v. Caulkins (Fla. 2d DCA 2024)…have to advise the trial court specifically that the reason for the departure is invalid" but can merely note its objection to departure just prior to sentencing. State v. Barnes, 753 So. 2d 605, 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); see also State v. Szempruch, 935 So. 2d 66, 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (noting that the State can preserve its objection to downward departure by making it clear to the court that it opposes modifying the sentence below the guidelines, even without arguing any specific grounds, but ruling that St…
Authorities Cited
- Scott v. Dugger, 634 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 1993)
- Tondrick Hough v. State, 679 So. 2d 1300 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)