R.A., THE FATHER, APPELLANT,
v.
P.A., THE MOTHER, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2006-08-09
No. 4D05-4128
STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.
935 So. 2d 120 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

R.A., the father, appeals the denial of his petition seeking termination of the parental rights of P.A., the mother. The trial court determined that the mother’s conduct was not egregious and that clear and convincing evidence did not establish that therapy for the mother would be futile. “An appellate court may reverse the trial court’s order denying a petition to terminate parental rights when the denial is not supported by competent substantial evidence and is not in the best interests of the children.” Dep’t of Children & Families v. K.F., 916 So. 2d 948, 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Competent substantial evidence supports the trial court’s conclusions in this case. We therefore affirm the order on review.

STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • In the Interest of E.R. and A.R. v. S.H. and F.R., 49 So. 3d 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
    …denying a petition to terminate parental rights when the denial is not supported by competent!,] substantial evidence and is not in the best interests of the children.’ ” H.D. v. J.L.D., 16 So. 3d 334, 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (quoting R.A. v. P.A., 935 So. 2d 120, 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)). A. The trial court did not err in finding that DCF proved statutory grounds for termination of the father’s parental rights, but it did err in failing to find that termination was the least restrictive means of protecting…
  • Creech v. Ryan, 972 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
    …he information was not before the original judge, the bond must be reduced to the level originally set. Santos v. Garrison, 691 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Moreover, the trial court cannot on its own initiative increase bond. Sueliman v. Jenne, 935 So. 2d 120,121 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). From the limited record presented in the case before us, there is no showing of changed circumstances and no notice to Creech that the trial court intended to increase his bond. All the reasons for revoking the bond were kn…
  • H.D. v. J.L.D., 16 So. 3d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
    …s. We agree. “An appellate court may reverse the trial court’s order denying a petition to terminate parental rights when the denial is not supported by competent substantial evidence and is not in the best interests of the children.” R.A. v. P.A., 935 So. 2d 120, 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (citation omitted). Here, the circuit court’s denial of the mother’s petition without a hearing was not supported by competent substantial evidence because the court received no evidence. We have recognized that chapter 39 p…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw