TERRY WILLIAMS BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2006-08-08
Nos. 1D05-3421, 1D05-3422
ERVIN, BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
935 So. 2d 593 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Brannon v. State, 850 So. 2d 452, 456 (Fla.2003) (“[T]he failure to preserve a fundamental sentencing error by motion under rule 3.800(b) or by objection during the sentencing hearing fore closes [the appellant] from raising the error on direct appeal.”); Jones v. State, 876 So. 2d 642, 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (“Sentencing errors are not reviewable on direct appeal unless they are preserved in the trial court, either by timely objection at sentencing or by a timely filed motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).”).

ERVIN, BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Davis v. State, 969 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
    …d pursuant to rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Simmons v. State, 965 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Griffin v. State, 958 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Woodard v. State, 946 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Brown v. State, 935 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Telfair v. State, 903 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Evans v. State, 895 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Cf. Aponte v. State, 896 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (holding that fundamental error regarding trial court’s loss of j…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw