WESTMINSTER COMMUNITY CARE SERVICES, ETC. ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
P.H., A MINOR, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENT
WESTMINSTER COMMUNITY CARE SERVICES, ETC. ET AL., PETITIONERS,
P.H., A MINOR, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENT
935 So. 2d 1258
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, J.
Petitioners request certiorari review of the trial court’s non-final, pretrial order imposing sanctions against petitioners for their discovery violations. The petition is denied because petitioners have failed to demonstrate a clear departure from the essential requirements of law resulting in irreparable injury. See Malone v. Costin, 410 So. 2d 569, 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); see also Rydell v. Rutter, 834 So. 2d 883, 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
PETITION DENIED.
SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Garren v. State, 976 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)…would receive probation based on legal advice from jail inmates, and “[wjhere the mistake or misunderstanding in entering a plea is attributable to the defendant, it is not error for the court to refuse to allow withdrawal of it.” See Acee v. State, 935 So. 2d 1258, 1258-59 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (quoting Johnson v. State, 648 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)). When a defendant enters an open plea, he or she indicates a “willingness to accept anything up to and including the maximum possible sentence.” Wagner, 895…
Authorities Cited
- Malone v. Costin, 410 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Rydell v. Gorham Rutter, Jr., 834 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)