DARRIN TERRANOVA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that adjudicating a defendant guilty of both manslaughter and aggravated battery, while sentencing only on the manslaughter charge, is permissible and does not violate double jeopardy principles.
The defendant was convicted by a jury of manslaughter and aggravated battery after beating the victim, who later died. The trial court adjudicated gui…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Blockburger Test cases and more on FLexlaw
[*287] PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals his convictions for manslaughter and aggravated battery by causing great bodily harm, permanent disability or permanent disfigurement. We affirm on all issues, but write to address the defendant’s argument that the trial court erred in adjudicating the defendant guilty of both manslaughter and aggravated battery.
The State charged the defendant with manslaughter and aggravated battery where the facts revealed the defendant beat the victim, who died several days later. Apparently, there was some question regarding the victim’s cause of death. The jury found the defendant guilty of both charges. The State then requested the court to adjudicate the defendant guilty on both charges, but requested that a sentence be imposed only on the manslaughter charge. This is precisely what the trial court did.
On appeal, the defendant argues the court erred in adjudicating the defendant guilty of both charges. We disagree. Our supreme court has consistently held that similar types of related crimes meet the Blockburger test and are not “degree variants” of the same underlying offense. See, e.g., State v. Florida, 894 So. 2d 941 (Fla.2005); Gordon v. State, 780 So. 2d 17 (Fla.2001).
We also approve of the trial court’s procedure of adjudicating the defendant guilty of both crimes, but withholding sentence on the second charge. In this way, the court retains the ability to sentence the defendant on the second charge should the first charge be reversed on appeal and avoids the problem that is created by either vacating the jury’s finding of guilt on the second charge or holding the second charge in abeyance. These later procedures often result in double jeopardy arguments that would not otherwise arise.
Affirmed.
GUNTHER, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mercer v. State, 219 So. 3d 936 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)…icated guilty of the aggravated battery of McClendon because it was a lesser included offense of manslaughter and involved the same victim. The court agreed that the two offenses violated double jeopardy, but concluded, based orí Terranova v. State, 937 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), that it would' be proper to adjudicate Mercer guilty of both offenses and merely withhold sentencing on the aggravated battery conviction. On appeal, Mercer raises several arguments, including a claim that the court improperly a…
Authorities Cited
- Bryon Gordon v. State, 780 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 2001)
- State v. Florida, 894 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 2005)