HAROLD B. PATE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HAROLD B. PATE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
937 So. 2d 700
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
As the notice of appeal is untimely, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Any pending motions are denied as moot.
ALLEN, DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McCALLUM v. Palm Beach Cnty. Sch. Dist. & F.A. Richard & Assocs., 969 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…23, 2007, concluding that she did not have jurisdiction to “adjudicate disputes arising from the Release Agreement” executed back in December 2003. The judge of compensation claims erred as a matter of law. See, e.g., Cartaya v. Coastline Distrib., 937 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (observing that the determination of the terms of a settlement agreement presents a question of law). Nothing in the settlement agreement precludes the judge of compensation claims from determining whether its terms required the…1 / 2
-
JEA v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 6 So. 3d 1247 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…y the manufacturer and affixed to the generator’s nameplate in Units 1 and 2 in the Power Park. We agree with the trial court that the meaning of the term “nameplate capacity” as used in section 8.3 is unambiguous, Cartaya v. Coastline Distribution, 937 So. 2d 700, 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law for the court); Lambert v. Berkley South Condominium Association, Inc., 680 So. 2d 588, 590 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (a contract term is ambiguous only if it “is reasonably su…