BENJAMIN LAFLOWER, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES R. MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
BENJAMIN LAFLOWER, APPELLANT,
JAMES R. MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
937 So. 2d 722
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm without prejudice to appellant’s right to file an administrative grievance challenging the deductions from his account for legal copying, pursuant to Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections, 920 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), review denied, 923 So. 2d 1162 (Fla.2006).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Prince v. State, 40 So. 3d 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…rs review is required to preserve a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to appointed counsel on direct appeal of a conviction and sentence. A postconviction movant has no Sixth Amendment or statutory right to appointed counsel. Mann v. State, 937 So. 2d 722, 726-27 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). . Although we hold that the unargued issues are waived, we have reviewed the transcript of the evidentiary hearing, and Prince’s claims. The trial court’s factual findings and credibility determinations are supported by…
-
Pub. Health Tr. OF Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Gelerme Metellus and Marie Lacroix Metellus, 948 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…trial on the basis of juror nondisclosure, Tejada, 814 So. 2d at 339 (delineating three elements, all of which must exist for a party to be awarded a new trial on the basis of juror nondisclosure), we need not reach that question. See Mann v. State, 937 So. 2d 722, 730 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (Shepherd, J., specially concurring)(noting that “[the] procedural ground [was] a sufficient ground to affirm the decision of the trial court” and therefore declining to join remainder of majority opinion); N. Fla. Women’s He…
-
Williams v. State, 99 So. 3d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…blic defenders, however, were apparently appointed solely to prosecute ground two. The duties of public defenders, as enumerated in section 27.51, Florida Statutes (2008), do not include postcon-viction representation. As explained in Mann v. State, 937 So. 2d 722, 729 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), “[ujnless a court makes the determination that representation is constitutionally mandated, funds, resources, and employees of the Public Defender’s Office may not be used directly or indirectly in collateral proceedings of…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Smith v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 920 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)