RONALD A. CORKER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the appellant's conviction and sentence for attempted robbery with a firearm while wearing a mask.
Appellant was found guilty by a jury of attempted robbery with a firearm while wearing a mask. The State introduced a letter from the Florida Departme…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Hearsay Objection cases and more on FLexlaw
SHAHOOD, J.
Appellant, Ronald Corker, was found guilty by a jury of attempted robbery with a firearm while wearing a mask. We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. We grant appellant’s Motion to Accept Amended Initial Brief.
As his fourth issue in his amended initial brief, appellant argues that the trial court erred by denying his hearsay objection to the introduction of a letter from the Florida Department of Corrections reflecting his most recent release date from prison. The State offered the letter at sentencing in order to establish appellant’s status as a Prison Releasee Reoffender. We affirm as to this issue based on this court’s recent en banc opinion in Yisrael v. State, No. 4D04-2967, 2006 WL 2355519, 938 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug.16, 2006).
We affirm as to all other issues raised by appellant without discussion. As in Yisrael we also certify conflict with Gray v. State, 910 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
Affirmed.
STEVENSON, C.J., and MAY, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ingram v. State, 943 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…rs imprisonment on Count II (grand theft) without a habitual offender designation. We affirm as to Count I on the authority of this court’s en banc opinion in Yisrael v. State, 938 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), and its opinion in Corker v. State, 937 So. 2d 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). As in Yisrael and Corker, we certify conflict with Gray v. State, 910 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Appellee concedes that appellant’s ten-year sentence on Count II was erroneous without a habitual offender designation. We ag…
-
Ragin v. State, 939 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…of appellant from prison. Appellant argues that such admission was (a) inadmissible hearsay, and (b) violated his right to confrontation. We affirm as to this issue based on Yisrael v. State, 938 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), and Corker v. State, 937 So. 2d 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). As in Yisrael and Corker we also certify conflict with Gray v. State, 910 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Finally, appellant argues the trial court committed error in sentencing him as a prison releasee reoffender (PRR) on the…
-
RAY v. State, 941 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…urt erred in sentencing him as a prison releasee reoffender based on inadmissible hearsay evidence. We affirm as to this issue based on this court’s recent en banc opinion in Yisrael v. State, 938 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), and Corker v. State, 937 So. 2d 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). As in Yisrael and Corker, we also certify conflict with Gray v. State, 910 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Affirmed. STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mitchell v. State, 938 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
- Gray v. State, 910 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)