STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA, AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND ALACHUA COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANTS,
v.
EUGENE C. HARTMAN ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. | 1957-04-17
94 So. 2d 742 Florida Supreme Court (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …rney’s fees, except in those cases where the appeal is taken by the condemnee and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Such an interpretation was adopted by this court in the case of State Road Department of Florida v. Hartman, Fla., 1957, 94 So. 2d 742. In an unpublished order annexed to our per curiam opinion we said: “Upon motion of the landowners, who were defendants in the eminent domain proceeding under Chapter 74 Florida Statutes 1955 and who were awarded compensation in the lower court whi…
  • State Rd. Dep't of Fla. v. Levato, 192 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966)
    …rney’s fees, except in those cases where the appeal is taken by the condemnee and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Such an interpretation was adopted by this court in the case of State Road Department of Florida v. Hartman, Fla., 1957, 94 So. 2d 742. In an unpublished order annexed to our per curiam opinion we said: “Upon motion of the landowners, who were defendants in the eminent domain proceeding under Chapter 74 Florida Statutes 1955 and who were awarded compensation in the lower court whi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw