MARIA NIEVES, APPELLANT,
v.
PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND F.A. RICHARD & ASSOCIATES, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2006-10-30
No. 1D05-4422
BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., concur; PADOVANO, J., dissents with opinion.
940 So. 2d 585 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings. See City of Riviera Beach v. Deliso, 713 So. 2d 426, 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (holding that the judge of compensation claims properly included permanent total disability benefits in the attorney’s fee calculation because the employer/servicing agent initially controverted compensability and because the claimant’s injury would not have been accepted as compensable and he would not have received any benefits without his attorney’s intervention).

BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., concur; PADOVANO, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissent
PADOVANO, J.,

PADOVANO, J.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. The judge of compensation claims explained in detail why the Deliso case does not require an award of attorney’s fees calculated on the amount of the permanent and total disability benefits. This case differs from Deliso in that the lawyer for the claimant did not show that the award of permanent total disability benefits came about as a result of his success in establishing that the claimant suffered a compensable injury. As the judge of compensation claims explained, counsel “failed to show that the permanent total disability benefits were reasonably predictable as a result of his intervention.” Because the record supports this controlling distinction made by the judge of compensation claims, I am unable to join in the majority’s conclusion that Deliso compels a reversal in this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Clark v. State, 43 So. 3d 814 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
    …erty is worth at least $100, a conviction for first degree petit theft must be reduced to second degree petit theft." Ortiz v. State, 36 So. 3d 901 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). See also White v. State, 993 So. 2d 611, 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); A.B. v. State, 940 So. 2d 585, 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Parrish v. State, 736 So. 2d 752, 753 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); J.C.B. v. State, 512 So. 2d 1073, 1076 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Accordingly, second-degree petit theft, as alleged here a misdemeanor of the second degree, § 812.014(3)(…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw