PETER L. BRANCH, APPELLANT,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Annmarie Balch v. HSBC Bank, 128 So. 3d 179 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)
  …ho is attempting to assert the rights of the non-party, Sher [*181] man Balch, to continue to participate in the lawsuit and to have the order reversed. The order submitted for review is a non-fínal and non-appealable order. See Favreau v. Favreau, 940 So. 2d 1188, 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Because the non-final order is not appealable, we will treat the Notice of Appeal as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari. Id. When a pro se litigant files frivolous law suits or pleadings in a lawsuit, the court has the aut…
• Harris v. Martye S. Gattie, 263 So. 3d 829 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
  …e order and converting the appeal to a petition for writ of certiorari); Epps v. State, 941 So. 2d 1206, 1206-07 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (reviewing order precluding a party from filing further pleadings pro se through certiorari); Favreau v. Favreau, 940 So. 2d 1188, 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (treating notice of appeal of order barring further pro se pleadings as a petition for writ of certiorari).2 And we grant certiorari and quash the sanctions order because the trial court failed to follow the proper proc…
• Hendrixson v. Frye, 994 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
  …2 So. 2d 793, 796 (Fla.2003); Lussy v. Fourth Dist. Court of Appeal, 828 So. 2d 1026, 1026-27 (Fla.2002); Jackson v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 790 So. 2d 398, 399 (Fla.2001); Johnson v. Wilbur, 981 So. 2d 479, 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Favreau v. Favreau, 940 So. 2d 1188, 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); see also State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48-49 (Fla.1999) (recognizing that “denying a pro se litigant the opportunity to file future petitions is a serious sanction” and holding that “it is important for courts to first…

Authorities Cited

• Taccara Shimere Allen v. Live OAK Ford Mercury, 647 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)