JERRY L. GUINADE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.850 cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Jerry L. Guinade appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Mr. Guinade alleges that he is entitled to postconviction relief. Specifically, he contends that the trial court violated Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720 by not asking him if there was any legal cause why he should not be sentenced following his conviction, and by not giving him an opportunity to present evidence and argument before pronouncing sentence. We affirm. Rule 3.850 does not authorize relief based on grounds that could have been or should have been raised at trial, and, if properly preserved, on direct appeal of the judgment and sentence. This claim could or should have been raised on direct appeal, and, therefore, is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion.
AFFIRMED.
GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ammy M. kogan v. Mildenberger, 127 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…ation below. Because this type of order was expressly removed from the list of appeal-able non-final orders included in Rule 9.130, we grant the motion and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Westwood One, Inc. v. Flight Express, Inc., 940 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (dismissing appeal of trial court’s non-final order granting motion for default for lack of jurisdiction). APPEAL DISMISSED.…
-
Singh v. U.S. Bank, 223 So. 3d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…See Mills v. Heenan, 382 So. 2d 1317, 1318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). We must question whether an order of default would be separately appealable; the trial court only granted the bank’s motion for default. See Westwood One, Inc. v. Flight Express, Inc., 940 So. 2d 1241, 1243 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (holding.that an order" which grants a motion for default “does not fall within the parameters of’ Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130). Further, the trial court’s order granting default did not enter final judgment i…
-
Mauna LOA Invs., LLC v. Anamaria Santiago, 122 So. 3d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…mple default” on liability rather than a final default judgment, the order was a non-final, interlocutory ruling, which was not subject to appellate review until Mauna’s appeal from the final judgment. See Westwood One, Inc. v. Flight Express, Inc., 940 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Bruno v. A.E. Handy & Assocs., Inc., 787 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Tieche v. Fla. Physicians Ins. Reciprocal, 431 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). . We note that the Amended Motion was denied by a prior, now-retired judge,…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence