SEAN CHILDS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Storm v. Decker, 971 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …en the short notice involved, the lack of emergency, and the totality of these circumstances, the motion to continue should have been granted to allow Storm and his counsel to appear and participate in the hearing. See, e.g., Traughber v. Traughber, 941 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Alternatively, once the trial judge was made aware of counsel’s diligent efforts by way of motion for rehearing, the court should have set aside the injunction and scheduled a new hearing, to assure Storm a reasonable opportunity…
• Kandyce McPherson v. Killyah Samuel, 392 So. 3d 565 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
• L.C. v. A.M.C., 67 So. 3d 1181 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
  …forts to obtain counsel between the time he received the notice and the time of the hearing. On appeal, the Grandfather argues that the service of notice only twenty-five hours before the hearing was insufficient. See, e.g., Traughber v. Traughber, 941 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (finding that the respondent received insufficient notice of the hearing on the permanent injunction where he was served with notice of the hearing the night before the hearing); Storm v. Decker, 971 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)…

Authorities Cited

• Paul v. State, 830 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
• Adams v. State, 774 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
• Nunez v. State, 912 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
• Ortiz v. State, 835 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
• Felton Epps v. State, 835 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
• Adlington v. State, 840 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)