PHILLIP BUTLER, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2006-10-11

No. 3D06-1642

Before FLETCHER and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

941 So. 2d 430 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sheffield v. State, 903 So. 2d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)(“ ‘a trial court must either state its rationale in its decision or attach those specific parts of the record that refute each claim presented in the motion’ ” (quoting Anderson v. State, 627 So. 2d 1170, 1171 (Fla.1993)))(emphasis added).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Butler v. State, 95 So. 3d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)

…ecause each of the counts 2-5 alleged a different victim, and in counts 6-9 the jury found that the defendant robbed four separate individuals such that four separate convictions on those counts were proper. This Court affirmed. See Butler v. State, 941 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Butler’s current petition, denied by the trial court on October 27, 2011, raises the same issues, i.e., that his right against double jeopardy was violated because he was convicted for four counts of kidnapping with a weapon and…

Authorities Cited

Anderson v. State, 627 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 1993)
Sheffield v. State, 903 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw