ANTHONY MONROE HOOD, ROXIE I. HOOD, APPELLANTS,
v.
UNION PLANTERS BANK, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2006-10-18
No. 1D04-2184
KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
941 So. 2d 1175 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, C.J.

BROWNING, C.J.

We dismiss the instant appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant Anthony Hood has no standing to appeal this foreclosure because he was not one of the parties named below, and made no effort to intervene. See, e.g., Stas v. Posada, 760 So. 2d 954, 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Barnett v. Barnett, 705 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Appellant Roxie Hood has not filed any documents associated with this appeal and, in fact, never filed a notice of appeal in this case. Because Anthony Hood cannot bring this appeal, and Roxie Hood has not actually appealed, we hereby dismiss the entire appeal.

DISMISSED.

KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • City of Coral Gables v. Garcia, 347 So. 3d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
    …Court of Appeal found that because the bank “was not a party in the dissolution action below, it had no standing to appeal the adverse order,” and thus, the wife could not appeal the order. See id.; see also, e.g., Hood v. Union Planters Bank, 941 So. 2d 1175, 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“Appellant . . . has no standing to appeal this foreclosure because he was not one of the parties named below, and made no effort to intervene.”). Indeed, a non-party seeking to participate in a case must generally mov…
  • Espaillat v. Sec. First Ins. Co. (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
    …in complying with the trial court’s order directed to Plaintiff Juan Espiallat. As such, non-party Appellant has no standing to appeal. See Edwards v. CIT Bank, N.A., 45 Fla. L. Weekly D1405 (Fla. 3d DCA June 10, 2020); Hood v. Union Planters Bank, 941 So. 2d 1175, 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Stas v. Posada, 760 So. 2d 954, 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Certiorari is not available as a remedy 1 The trial court’s order on Security First’s motion to dismiss to allow Plaintiff Jose Espaillat to amend, or alternatively…
  • Edwards v. Cit Bank, N.A. (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
    …ntervention shall be in subordination to, and in recognition of, the propriety of the main proceeding, unless otherwise ordered by the court in its discretion.” and thus, the wife could not appeal the order)); see also Hood v. Union Planters Bank, 941 So. 2d 1175, 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (holding “[a]ppellant . . . has no standing to appeal this foreclosure because he was not one of the parties named below, and made no effort to intervene”); Stas v. Posada, 760 So. 2d 954, 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (dismissing…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw