JOHNNY BRADY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHNNY BRADY, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
943 So. 2d 284
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).
Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fernandez v. Haber & Ganguzza, LLP, 30 So. 3d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…(2) the defendant’s knowledge of the contract; (3) the defendant’s intentional procurement of the contractual breach; (4) the absence of justification or privilege; and (5) the plaintiff suffered damages from the breach. Marquez v. PanAmerican Bank, 943 So. 2d 284, 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). In the case before us, the trial court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of Ganguzza regarding the tortious interference claim because the undisputed evidence in the record shows the existence of litigation privil…