JOHNNY HARGREAVES, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Saenz v. Campos, 967 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …o strike the proposal for settlement, but never ruled on the plaintiffs motion to tax costs and fees. We give proposals for settlement de novo review. Jamieson v. Kurland, 819 So. 2d 267, 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); accord, Miami-Dade County v. Ferrer, 943 So. 2d 288, 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2006), provides the substantive law concerning proposals for settlement while Rule 1.442, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, provides its procedural mechanism. Rule 1.442(c)(2)(B)-(D) requir…
• Haas Automation, Inc. v. FOX, 243 So. 3d 1017 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
  …). "An appellate court applies the de novo standard of review in determining whether an offer of settlement comports with rule 1.442 and section 768.79 because a 'proposal for settlement is in the nature of a contract.' " Miami-Dade Cty. v. Ferrer, 943 So. 2d 288, 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (quoting Jamieson v. Kurland, 819 So. 2d 267, 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ). Because the Foxes' joint proposal failed to apportion the settlement demand between the two Fox couples, we need not, and therefore do not, address whet…
• E. Atl. Realty & Inv. Inc. v. Gsomr LLC, 14 So. 3d 1215 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
  …purtenances, rights, easements, and rights of way incident thereto.” . In determining whether a proposal for settlement comports with Rule 1.442 and section 768.79, appellate courts apply the de novo standard of review. Miami-Dade County v. Ferrer, 943 So. 2d 288, 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). . Because the Sink decision recites no facts that reveal how the proposal in that case was sufficiently ambiguous to preclude its enforceability, Sink offers no guidance as to the specific proposal at issue here.…

Authorities Cited

• Robinson v. State, 761 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1999)
• Lopez v. State, 536 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 1988)