BENJAMIN RODGERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that even if prior military convictions were improperly scored, the error was harmless because the same sentence could have been imposed. The court also agreed that an evidentiary hearing was necessary to compare the military convictions to Florida statutes.
[1] Military convictions from other jurisdictions must be scored at the severity level of the analogous or parallel Florida crime.
[2] When scoring out-of-jurisdiction convictions, courts must review only the elements of the crime, not the underlying facts.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant sought to correct an illegal sentence, claiming his scoresheet improperly scored two military convictions for rape. The lower court denied r…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rule 3.800(A) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Benjamin Rodgers, appeals the denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Rodgers claimed the scoresheet prepared for his no contest plea to the charge of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon contained erroneously scored prior record offenses. Specifically, Rodgers believed the score-sheet improperly scored his two military convictions for rape as level 10 offenses. It does not appear that the military conviction was made a part of the record. The lower court denied relief, believing an evidentiary hearing was necessary to compare the military convictions to the applicable Florida Statutes for sexual battery and therefore not cognizable under rule 3.800(a). We agree that from our record on appeal, it does not appear that the record was sufficient to determine the issue without an evidentiary hearing. Moreover, appellant would not be entitled to relief even if the military convictions were scored on the scoresheet at the offense level which he contends is correct.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.704(d)(14) requires the court to include, under prior record, offenses committed by the offender in other jurisdictions, including offenses committed while serving in the military. These convictions “are scored at the severity level at which the analogous or parallel Florida crime is located.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(14). In Holybrice v. State, 753 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), we noted that when applying this rule, courts must review “only the elements of the out-of-state crime, and not the underlying facts....” Id. at 623 (quoting Dautel v. State, 658 So. 2d 88, 91 (Fla.1995)).
Appellant contends that if the two military convictions were correctly scored, his scoresheet would have been reduced by twenty points. However, because the same sentence “could have been imposed” under the scoresheet corrected as appellant claims, any error was harmless. See Brooks v. State, 930 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (en banc).
GUNTHER, WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Dautel v. State, 658 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 1995)
- Brooks v. State, 930 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
- Jordache Holybrice v. State, 753 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)