EDWARD BELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EDWARD BELL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
943 So. 2d 294
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See MacFarland v. State, 929 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
GUNTHER, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. State, 2 So. 3d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…this court never ruled on the merits of the first and amended motions when it affirmed the summary denial without prejudice. We specifically authorized the defendant to file yet another amended motion that was technically sufficient. Smith v. State, 943 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (affirming summary denial of the motions, “but without prejudice to appellant filing an amended motion that includes” the required oath). The defendant filed the second amended motion with an oath on December 14, 2006. Thirty-se…
Authorities Cited
- Lifton Robinson, Jr. v. State, 929 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
- MacFARLAND v. State, 929 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)