JAMES G. HORTON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2006-11-08
No. 1D05-4716
KAHN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
943 So. 2d 859 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Horton sought habeas corpus and certiorari relief challenging the Department of Corrections' authority to forfeit gain-time credits he earned before his initial release, even though the trial court awarded him credit for time served in a plea agreement for probation violation. The court held that DOC has statutory authority to forfeit previously earned gain-time upon revocation of probation for offenses committed between October 1, 1989, and December 31, 1993, regardless of the trial court's credit award.


Holding

Yes. For defendants who committed offenses between October 1, 1989, and December 31, 1993, DOC has discretionary authority to forfeit credit for prior gain-time upon revocation of probation, even when the sentencing judge has authorized credit for unforfeited gain-time. DOC may unilaterally declare previously earned gain-time forfeited.


Headnotes

[1] Department of Corrections may forfeit gain-time earned prior to release upon revocation of probation for offenses committed between October 1, 1989, and December 31, 1993…

[2] Department of Corrections has the discretion to unilaterally declare gain-time forfeited, even if the sentencing judge has authorized credit for unforfeited gain time.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Even though the sentencing judge has authorized credit for unforfeited gain time, DOC may now unilaterally declare it forfeited.”

Establishes DOC's authority to forfeit gain-time despite trial court's credit award, from Forbes v. Singletary

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Horton was originally sentenced to 15 years in DOC plus 7 years probation under the 1991 guidelines. After release, he violated probation. Pursuant to…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the State’s motion for rehearing, we withdraw the original opinion and issue the following opinion.

Petitioner was sentenced under the 1991 guidelines to 15 years in the Department of Corrections (DOC) followed by seven years of probation. Following his release from DOC, Petitioner violated probation. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Petitioner pled guilty to violating probation in return for a sentence of 20 years in the DOC, with credit for 15 years and 260 days of credit for time served.

Upon Petitioner’s entry into DOC, he received credit, but had 2,900 days forfeited. DOC denied Petitioner’s request for additional credit, noting that, pursuant to section 944.28(1), for offenses committed on or after October 1, 1989, DOC may forfeit gain-time earned prior to release, and DOC rules provide gain-time earned prior to release will be forfeited upon revocation of probation. DOC forfeited all of the gain-time Petitioner earned prior to his release.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the circuit court, arguing DOC lacked authority to review and reject a trial court’s specific award of credit for jail or prison time, or to do anything other than execute sentence exactly as imposed by the court. Petitioner argued his plea agreement was agreed to by the court, the State, and Petitioner, and had Petitioner known DOC had the authority to alter the court’s sentence, he would not have entered the plea.

The trial court denied the petition concluding DOC acted within the scope of its authority when it forfeited Petitioner’s gain-time, and DOC followed its guidelines when it established the sentence structure upon Petitioner’s arrival. Petitioner then sought a writ of certiorari in this court. The petition must be denied.

For defendants who committed their offenses between October 1, 1989, and December 31, 1993, DOC, like the sentencing judge, has the discretion to forfeit credit for prior gain-time upon revocation of probation. See Forbes v. Singletary, 684 So. 2d 173 (Fla.1996). “Even though the sentencing judge has authorized credit for unforfeited gain time, DOC may now unilaterally declare it forfeited.” Id. at 174-175.

Here, the trial court’s award of credit was “for the fifteen years he’s already served, plus two hundred and sixty some odd days.” This award merely gives credit for time actually served, without interfering with DOC’s authority to revoke previously earned gain-time. Petitioner may have entered into the plea agreement believing he would receive the full 15 years, 260 days of credit. However, the proper remedy is not for this court to ignore Florida law that allows DOC to forfeit gain-time. See McAllister v. State, 821 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

The petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Chase v. State, 57 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
    …o his serving 24 months, 181 days in prison. It is well-settled that the Department of Corrections has the authority to forfeit all of a defendant’s gain time following a violation of probation. See § 944.28(1), Fla. Stat. (2007); Horton v. State, 943 So. 2d 859, 860 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). However, a defendant is entitled to have a plea agreement enforced if the Department’s forfeiture of gain time thwarted the intent of a negotiated plea. See, e.g., McAllister v. State, 821 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (“…
  • Kemp v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2020)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw