REASHAD ROSIER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2006-12-15
No. 2D05-2899
WHATLEY, NORTHCUTT, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
943 So. 2d 1018 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to Reashad Rosier’s right, if any, to file a timely and sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

WHATLEY, NORTHCUTT, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Beckman v. State, 230 So. 3d 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
    …any sort. Therefore, this issue was not preserved for appellate review. “Generally, an appellate court cannot address claims raised for the first time on appeal.” Galvez v. Ramos, 941 So. 2d 475, 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); see also Manning v. Tunnell, 943 So. 2d 1018, 1020 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (same). In any event, even if this issue were preserved, this claim has no merit. The defendant tries to draw a distinction between using evidence of Asperger’s syndrome to show he could not form the premeditated‘intent to…
  • Reashod Rosier v. State, 144 So. 3d 604 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
    …comment. A jury found Rosier guilty of attempted first-degree murder and armed robbery with a firearm, and the court sentenced Rosier to life imprisonment on both charges. This court affirmed Rosier’s convictions and sentences. See Rosier v. State, 943 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (per curiam). The mandate issued on January 10, 2007. Rosier filed his initial rule 3.850 motion on April 4, 2007. On April 16, 2008, after considering a response from the State, the postconviction court entered an order denying i…
  • …de – which purportedly no longer provides for a minimum required landing in a residential setting – should, instead, apply here. “As a general rule, an appellate court cannot address claims raised for the first time on appeal.” Manning v. Tunnell, 943 So. 2d 1018, 1020 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Moreover, unsworn legal argument of counsel is not evidence. See Chase Home Loans LLC v. Sosa, 104 So. 3d 1240, 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“[U]nsworn representations of counsel about factual matters do not have any evident…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw