PATRICK J. O'HAVER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2006-12-13
No. 3D06-504
Before WELLS, SUAREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
944 So. 2d 498 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s successive and meritless motion for post conviction relief. We caution the defendant that his filing of any further frivolous pro se pleadings may result in sanctions including a prohibition against his filing of any further pro se filings, and forfeiture of gain time. Britt v. State, 931 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Cole v. State, 913 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Doyle v. State, 979 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
    …the Department of Corrections that it bring disciplinary procedures against him under paragraph 944.28(2)(a) and section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2007), but also a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this court. See O’Haver v. State, 944 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Johnson v. State, 915 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Petition denied.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw