ROBERTO G. ORDONEZ-MEDINA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERTO G. ORDONEZ-MEDINA, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
944 So. 2d 550
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Irizarry v. State, 905 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (trial court’s ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal is affirmed on appeal if a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt), review denied, 917 So. 2d 194 (Fla.2005); Lee v. State, 869 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (admission of hearsay harmless beyond a reasonable doubt where it was cumulative of other evidence).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Irizarry v. State, 905 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
- LEE v. State, 869 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)