STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
ROBERT LEE SMILEY, JR., RESPONDENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
ROBERT LEE SMILEY, JR., RESPONDENT
944 So. 2d 1027
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2006)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Other
On Motion for Rehearing
WARNER, J.
We deny rehearing but grant respondent’s motion to certify the issue as one of great public importance.
DOES SECTION 776.013, FLORIDA STATUTES (2005), APPLY TO CASES PENDING AT THE TIME THE STATUTE BECAME EFFECTIVE?
FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smiley v. State, 966 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 2007)…district court of appeal in which the following question was certified by the court to be of great public importance: DOES SECTION 776.013, FLORIDA STATUTES (2005), APPLY TO CASES PENDING AT THE TIME THE STATUTE BECAME EFFECTIVE? State v. Smiley, 944 So. 2d 1027, 1028 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we answer the certified question in the negative. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The instant action arises from the decision by the Four…1 / 2
-
Love v. State, 247 So. 3d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
-
Nulutagua-Sanchez v. State, 954 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…123 (Fla.2006). However, we certify the same question of great public importance as we did on rehearing in Smiley: DOES SECTION 776.013, FLORIDA STATUTES (2005), APPLY TO CASES PENDING AT THE TIME THE STATUTE BECAME EFFECTIVE? State v. Smiley, 944 So. 2d 1027, 1028 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). GUNTHER, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.…