BENJAMIN COMBS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the petition in part, remanding for post-conviction motions to be heard by a circuit court judge.
[1] Prohibition is a remedy to prevent the doing of something, not to undo something already done.
[2] A writ of prohibition cannot be used to vacate a conviction and sentence or to compel a new trial for events that have already occurred.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePetitioner was convicted by a temporarily assigned county court judge and sought to vacate the conviction and sentence, claiming no order assigned the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Assignment Of Judges cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The defendant filed a petition for writ of prohibition seeking to vacate his conviction and sentence and prevent the county court judge from proceeding with post-conviction matters. We grant the petition in part for the reasons that follow.
Petitioner was convicted after a trial conducted by the county court judge who had been temporarily assigned to circuit court. Petitioner seeks vacation of his conviction and sentence and a new trial, claiming there was no order in effect assigning the county court judge to circuit court. We deny this request as it is beyond the scope of prohibition relief. See Administrator, Retreat Hosp. v. Johnson In and For Broward County, 660 So. 2d 333, 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (quoting English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293, 296-97 (Fla.1977)) (the purpose of prohibition is to prevent the doing of something, not to compel the undoing of something already done).
Petitioner states in his reply that he has addressed the issue concerning the jurisdiction of the county court judge in his post-conviction motions filed in the trial court, and he reserves the right to address this issue in that manner. With respect to matters post-appeal, the parties agree that there is no current order of assignment permitting the county court judge to preside over petitioner’s pending post-conviction motions. Accordingly, we remand for consideration of the post-conviction motions by a circuit court judge. See Diaz v. State, 868 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).1
Finally, we deny petitioner’s request that we remand for consideration as to whether he must surrender pending resolution of his post-conviction motions. Appellant’s conviction and sentence have been affirmed on appeal. See Combs v. State, 925 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). This court has since indicated that there is no reason why Combs’ sentence should not go forward without delay.
GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur. . We decline to comment on the ultimate validity of a reassignment of the county court judge to this case via a new administrative order.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Carey English v. McCRARY, 348 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 1977)
- Diaz v. State, 868 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
- Hutchinson v. State, 660 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
- Adm'r, Retreat Hosp. v. The Honorable W. Clayton Johnson of the Cir. Court of the Seventeenth Jud. Cir. In & For Broward Cnty., 660 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)