MIKE ARTHUR MOORE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Jimenez v. State, 196 So. 3d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
  …panoply of procedural vehicles with which to challenge the lawfulness of their incarceration, see Art. I, § 21, Fla. Const. (“The courts shall be open to every person for redress of any injury ....”); Spencer, 751 So. 2d at 49; Concepcion v. State, 944 So. 2d 1069, 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), the constitutional right of access to the courts is not unfettered. The right to proceed pro se will be forfeited where a party abuses the judicial process by the continued filing of “successive motions which have been hear…
• Ruiz v. State, 992 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
  …Rule 3.850. Because Ruiz’s claims have already been adversely decided on the merits, the claims are not cognizable under rule 3.800(a), and he is both time-barred and procedurally barred from raising them under rule 3.850. See Concepcion v. State, 944 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Frivolous Appeals On June 19, 2008, we issued an order directing Ruiz to show why he should not be prohibited from filing further pro se pleadings in this Court. After reading Ruiz’s response, we find he has not shown good caus…
• Solomon Roberts v. State, 224 So. 3d 289 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
  …panoply of procedural vehicles with which to challenge the lawfulness of their incarceration, see Art. I, § 21, Fla. Const. (“The courts shall be open to every person for redress of any injury .,. .”); Spencer, 751 So. 2d at 48; Concepcion v. State, 944 So. 2d 1069, 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), the constitutional right of access to the courts is not unfettered. The right to proceed pro se will be forfeited where a party abuses the judicial process by the continued filing of “successive motions which have been hear…

Authorities Cited

• Salyers v. State, 705 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)