STEVEN MERCER, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
STEVEN MERCER, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
944 So. 2d 1102
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Domingo Cabrera v. Outdoor Empire & Fcci Ins., 108 So. 3d 691 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…ase in separation [*694] agreement applied to employment relationship with employer and it was unnecessary for agreement to be submitted to JCC to be binding on entitlement to further workers’ compensation benefits); Brewer v. Laborfinders of Tampa, 944 So. 2d 1102, 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (holding represented employee’s general release of employer in unrelated claim sufficient to affect settlement of workers’ compensation claim, notwithstanding fact that employee’s workers’ compensation counsel was not infor…
-
Martinez v. Preferred Care P'rs, Inc., 223 So. 3d 1117 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…ts the defendants, as it is undisputed that the claims in Martinez’s complaint accrued pri- or to the execution of the general release. See AXA Equitable Life Ins. Co. v. Gelpi, 12 So. 3d 783, 786 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Brewer v. Laborfinders of Tampa, 944 So. 2d 1102, 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). It is also undisputed that Martinez failed to file a reply containing any legal theory that could result in the avoidance of the defendants’ general release. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.100 (“If an answer or third-party answer…