TERI L. ROTH, AKA TERI L. DONOVAN, APPELLANT,
v.
ALL-AMERICAN INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC, ALL-AMERICAN FORECLOSURE SOLUTIONS, LLC, UNITED MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, DEREK K. RUNION, INDIVIDUALLY AND MELISSA SPENCER, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLEES

Fla. 2d DCA | 2006-12-27
No. 2D06-2935
SILBERMAN and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
944 So. 2d 1239 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The circuit court erred in issuing a writ of possession without conducting a hearing on the appellant's exceptions to a magistrate's recommendation.


Facts & Procedural History

The circuit court referred a case to a magistrate, who issued a recommendation. The appellant filed exceptions and requested a hearing, but the circui…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
WHATLEY, Judge.

WHATLEY, Judge.

Teri L. Roth appeals an order of the circuit court issuing a writ of possession. The circuit court held that because Roth had “exhausted all remedies available at the trial level, a writ of possession shall issue forthwith on the subject property.” We conclude that the circuit court erred in issuing the writ of possession and reverse.

The circuit court had previously referred this cause to a magistrate to conduct a hearing on the Appellees’ motion to enforce settlement agreement. The magistrate issued a recommendation, and Roth filed exceptions to the magistrate’s recommendation and requested a hearing. The circuit court denied Roth’s exceptions and issued the writ of possession without conducting a hearing on Roth’s exceptions.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(h) provides as follows:

The magistrate shall file the report and serve copies on the parties. The parties may serve exceptions to the report within 10 days from the time it is served on them. If no exceptions are filed within that period, the court shall take appropriate action on the report. If exceptions are filed, they shall be heard on reasonable notice by either party.

This court has held that a circuit court must conduct a hearing on a party’s exceptions to a magistrate’s report when one is requested. Yoxsimer v. Yoxsimer, 918 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Fonte v. Alvarez, 491 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). In the present case, the circuit court erred in denying Roth’s exceptions to the magistrate’s recommendation and issuing the writ of possession without conducting a hearing on the exceptions.

Accordingly, we reverse the order issuing the writ of possession and remand this case for the circuit court to conduct a hearing on Roth’s exceptions.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

SILBERMAN and KELLY, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Collado v. Pavlow, 951 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
    …on the report. If exceptions are filed, they shall be heard on reasonable notice by either party. Subsection (h) requires a circuit court to afford a hearing on a party’s timely served exceptions to the report. See Roth v. All-American Inv. Props., 944 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Yoxsimer v. Yoxsimer, 918 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (under Rule 1.490(h), litigant who requests hearing on exceptions but is not afforded one is deprived of due process). The purpose of such a hearing is for the trial court t…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw