LARRY PRIDE, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2006-12-28
No. 1D05-3996
WEBSTER, BENTON, AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
944 So. 2d 1243 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Larry Pride, Jr. appeals his conviction for sale of cocaine. We summarily affirm Issues I and II raised by Pride. In his third issue, appellant argues that the trial court committed a sentencing error contrary to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1) by imposing a public-defender lien without affording him notice of the right to contest the amount. We agree and reverse. See Schimmel v. State, 940 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Wagner v. McDonough, 927 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); and Saunders v. State, 863 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). On remand, the trial court, in its discretion, may reimpose the lien after compliance with rule 3.720(d)(1).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WEBSTER, BENTON, AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. State, 7 So. 3d 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
    …d hold a hearing on this issue; if no written objection is filed, the court may reimpose the fees without a hearing. McGee v. State, 963 So. 2d 931, 932 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); see also Jerry v. State, 955 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Pride v. State, 944 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the public defender’s fees are stricken. On remand, if Smith files a written objection to the amount of the fees within thirty days of this court’s mandate, t…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw