ORANGE COUNTY FIRE RESCUE AND UNISOURCE ADMINISTRATORS, INC., APPELLANTS,

v.

TONY ANTONELLI, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. McFADDEN, 50 So. 3d 1131 (Fla. 2010)
  …ordered. CANADY, C.J., and QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. LEWIS, J., dissenting with an opinion. PARIENTE, J., recused. . The State also asserts conflict with the decisions of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in both Burkes v. State, 946 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), and Olson v. State, 705 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), and the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Johnson v. [*1132] State, 545 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Con…
• Sandor Eduardo Guillen v. State, 189 So. 3d 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
  …had changed his testimony, the State decided to call Wright as a witness. If the State listed Wright as soon as Wright was consulted and the State decided to add him as a potential witness, then there was no discovery violation, see Burkes v. State, 946 So. 2d 34, 37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (“[Rule 3.220(j)J is violated when the State or the defense withholds ‘additional witnesses or material’, that, if , discovered earlier, would have been subject to mandatory disclosure”) (emphasis added), and the inquiry as t…
• State v. Fernandez, 141 So. 3d 1211 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
  …f witnesses, the prosecution need not disclose such statements unless the statements are written, recorded, or otherwise reduced to writing. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.220(b)(1)(B). See State v. McFadden, 50 So. 3d 1131, 1132-33 (Fla.2010); Burkes v. State, 946 So. 2d 34, 36-37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Balboa v. State, 446 So. 2d 1134,1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Witness statements appearing in pertinent police and investigative reports are expressly included within the definition of statements that the prosecution must dis…

Authorities Cited

• Theron Remington v. City OF Ocala/United Self Insured, 940 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)