ORLANDO CRESPO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ORLANDO CRESPO, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
946 So. 2d 598
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Robinson v. State, 761 So. 2d 269 (Fla.1999).
THOMPSON, PALMER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mendez v. State, 42 So. 3d 848 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…ase, that means he must allege where in the record information can be found that demonstrates he served time in the Lake County Jail solely because of an Orange County detainer. See Ponce v. State, 24 So. 3d 724 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Hamage v. State, 946 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Alternatively, if the Appellant believes an evi-dentiary hearing is necessary to resolve his claim, he may file a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion. Because the time for filing a rule 3.850 motion expired while this appeal was pe…
-
Burriesci v. State, 955 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…1-292 (Fla.2003). We find that the amended motion was legally insufficient because it failed to show that appellant was entitled to additional jail credit based on factual matters ascertainable from the trial court’s records. See Harnage v. State, 946 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). However, affir-mance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a rule 3.850 motion within thirty (30) days of issuance of this Court’s opinion raising this claim. Decoste v. State, 898 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).…
Authorities Cited
- Robinson v. State, 761 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1999)