WALTER J. BRYSON PAVING CO.
v.
STATE FOR THE USE OF PACE CO.
WALTER J. BRYSON PAVING CO.
STATE FOR THE USE OF PACE CO.
111 Fla. 402
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 149 So. 565
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This is a companion case to the preceding-case of Walter J. Bryson Paving Company and Southern Surety Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of Florida for the use of The Lewis Bear Company, Defendant In Error, and the same having been considered, it is now ordered that the judgment of the circuit court be affirmed on the authority of the opinion and judgment in that case, filed at this term. See page 349.
Affirmed.
Davis, C. J., and Wi-iitfield, Ellis, Terrell, and Brown, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
YOO KUN WHA v. Kelly, 154 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1963)…. Forbes v. Board of Health of Escambia County, 27 Fla. 189, 9 So. 446; Fla. Cent. & P. R. Co. v. Foxworth, 41 Fla. 1, 25 So. 338; State ex rel. Buford, Atty. Gen. v. Watkins, County Clerk, 88 Fla. 392, 102 So. 347; Orange County v. Robinson (1933), 111 Fla. 402, 149 So. 604. In 1961 the Legislature attempted by five local laws enacted after publication of notice to exclude Duval, Hillsborough, Brow-ard, Orange and Palm Beach Counties from the operation of a great many existing laws and to repeal such laws…