JEFFREY PRATTE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Jeffrey Pratte appeals his convictions for attempted robbery with a deadly weapon, fourteen counts of robbery with a weapon, and twenty counts of false imprisonment, challenging both a jury instruction regarding involuntary intoxication and his life sentence. The court affirms his convictions and sentences, holding that the jury's verdict for robbery with a weapon constituted a sufficient finding that Pratte carried a weapon to support first-degree felony scoring.
The court affirmed the convictions and sentences. The jury's guilty verdict on the charges of robbery with a weapon constituted a specific finding that Pratte carried a weapon during the robberies, thus permitting the trial court to score each conviction as a first-degree felony. With a scoresheet total of 943 points exceeding the 363-point threshold under Florida statute, the trial court properly exercised its discretion in imposing a life sentence.
[1] A jury's verdict of guilty for robbery with a weapon constitutes a specific finding that the defendant carried a weapon during the commission of the robberies.
[2] A trial court may impose a life sentence for robbery with a weapon if the defendant's total sentencing scoresheet points equal or exceed 363.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“To support a finding that Mr. Pratte carried a weapon, the jury had to find Mr. Pratte guilty of a crime that involved the use of a weapon or answer a question on a special verdict form indicating that he carried a weapon during the robberies.”
Establishes the legal standard for determining whether a defendant carried a weapon in a robbery case.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJeffrey Pratte was convicted of one count of attempted robbery with a deadly weapon, fourteen counts of robbery with a weapon, and twenty counts of fa…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attempted Robbery With A Deadly Weapon cases and more on FLexlaw
LaROSE, Judge.
Jeffrey Pratte appeals his convictions and sentences for one count of attempted robbery with a deadly weapon, fourteen counts of robbery with a weapon, and twenty counts of false imprisonment. He argues that the trial court erred in refusing to provide a jury instruction for involuntary intoxication caused by prescription drugs. See Cirack v. State, 201 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1967), superseded, by statute on other grounds as stated, in Linn v. Fossum, 946 So. 2d 1032, 2006 WL 3093186 (Fla. Nov. 2, 2006). Additionally, Mr. Pratte contends that the trial court erred in sentencing him to life imprisonment without an express jury finding that he carried a weapon during the robberies. We affirm the convictions and sentences but write to clarify the basis for sentencing Mr. Pratte to life imprisonment.
Normally, robbery with a weapon is a first-degree felony punishable by a prison sentence of up to thirty years. See § 812.13(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001); § 775.082(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001). However, if the defendant’s total sentencing scoresheet points equal or exceed 363, the trial court may impose a life sentence. § 921.0014(2), Fla. Stat. (2001); Willis v. State, 785 So. 2d 648, 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Mr. Pratte’s scoresheet totaled 943 points. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a life sentence.
Mr. Pratte argues that the trial court improperly scored his robbery convictions as first-degree felonies, because there was no specific jury finding that he carried a weapon during the robberies. According to Mr. Pratte, the trial court should have scored each robbery conviction as a sec ond-degree felony. Doing so would have lowered his scoresheet total below the 363-point statutory minimum for a life sentence under section 921.0014(2).
To support a finding that Mr. Pratte carried a weapon, the jury had to find Mr. Pratte guilty of a crime that involved the use of a weapon or answer a question on a special verdict form indicating that he carried a weapon during the robberies. See State v. Overfelt, 457 So. 2d 1385, 1387 (Fla.1984). The trial court instructed the jury to convict Mr. Pratte of robbery with a weapon only if they concluded that he carried a weapon during the robberies. The verdict reflects that the jury found Mr. Pratte guilty of robbery with a weapon. The jury’s answer on the verdict forms constituted a specific jury finding that Mr. Pratte carried a weapon during the robberies.
Based on the jury’s verdict, the trial court correctly scored each robbery conviction as a first-degree felony. Mr. Pratte’s scoresheet correctly reflects robbery with a weapon as a level 8 offense, and the trial court correctly assessed additional sentencing points for each robbery conviction. See § 921.0012(3)(h), Fla. Stat. (2001). Mr. Pratte’s scoresheet total correctly reflected 943 points, and the trial court acted within its discretion to impose a life sentence.
Affirmed.
SILBERMAN and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Curls v. State, 216 So. 3d 761 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…726 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 1999); Kirby v. State, 198 So. 3d 15 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Doby v. State, 25 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Pratte v. State, 946 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Bizzell v. State, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Luttrell v. State, 513 So. 2d 1298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Small v. Stat…
-
Mercado v. State, 161 So. 3d 442 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Tucker v. State, 726 So. 2d 768 (Fla.1999); Pratte v. State, 946 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). DAVIS, C.J., and CRENSHAW and BLACK, JJ., Concur.…
-
Miller v. State, 197 So. 3d 611 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…. 2d 517 (Fla.2007); Tucker v. State, 726 So. 2d 768 (Fla.1999); Miller v. State, 177 So. 3d 616 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (table decision); Lee v. State, 130 So. 3d 707 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Knight v. State, 6 So. 3d 733 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Pratte v. State, 946 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Harris v. State, 777 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). SILBERMAN, WALLACE, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Overfelt, 457 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 1984)
- Cirack v. State, 201 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 1967)
- Linn v. Basil D. Fossum, M.D., 946 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 2006)
- Willis v. State, 785 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)