M & Z PROPERTIES 2002, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

RONBIL, INC., A/K/A METRO TRANSMISSION, AND RONALD J. SHAIMAN, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Butler v. State, 24 So. 3d 669 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Helton v. State, 947 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).…
• Gonzalez v. State, 41 So. 3d 1050 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
  ….Crim. P. 3.853(b)(3), (4). To determine whether the allegations in a motion for DNA testing are facially sufficient under rule 3.853(b), the court must consider the facts of the particular crime for which the movant was convicted. Helton v. State, 947 So. 2d 495, 498 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). The crime charged in this case did not involve multiple perpetrators or multiple victims; either Gonzalez had sexual intercourse with the victim or he did not. His motion asserted his innocence and stated that several hours…
• Taylor v. State, 15 So. 3d 907 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
  …ested by the motion will exonerate the movant of the crime for which the movant was sentenced, or a statement how the DNA testing will mitigate the sentence received by the mov-ant for that crime[.]” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(3). See Helton v. State, 947 So. 2d 495, 497-98 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Peterson v. State, 919 So. 2d 573, 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Fuentes v. State, 907 So. 2d 609, 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Saffold v. State, 850 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); see also Lott v. State, 931 So. 2d 807, 820-21 (Fla…

Authorities Cited

• Murphy H. Goodman v. Brasseria la Capannina, Inc., 602 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 1992)