ILENE KAHAN, APPELLANT,
v.
GUARDIANSHIP OF SAMUEL SHEPTOFF, APPELLEE
ILENE KAHAN, APPELLANT,
GUARDIANSHIP OF SAMUEL SHEPTOFF, APPELLEE
947 So. 2d 635
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Smith v. Lynch, 821 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).
STONE, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Zarudny v. Zarudny, 241 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
-
Fahad A.A.M.A. Alobaid v. Saba Khan, 306 So. 3d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)…temporary time-sharing plan pursuant to section 61.517(1). See McAbee, 259 So. 3d at 139. 6 6 We decline to resolve the issue of initial child custody jurisdiction herein, as this is being litigated in family court. See Spano v. BB ex rel. Bruce, 947 So. 2d 635, 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“Where custody, visitation and support considerations are implicated in the context of alleged domestic violence, the better practice is for the trial court to enter a temporary order . . . while directing the parties to lit…
-
Gavin D. Caddy v. Sue-Ann N. Robinson (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)…that issues of child custody may be necessarily implicated in DV actions, they have also held that the abbreviated DV proceedings should not become the primary forum in which to determine family law issues. See, e.g., Spano v. BB ex rel. Bruce, 947 So. 2d 635, 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); O’Neill v. Stone, 721 So. 2d 393, 396 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). “The better practice in such a case would be for the trial court to enter a temporary order . . . and direct the parties to litigate their subsequent custody and…
Authorities Cited
- Smith v. Lynch, 821 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)