MICHELLE SPENCE-JONES, PETITIONER,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSION AND THE HONORABLE ERROLL H. POWELL, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE, STATE OF FLORIDA, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS, RESPONDENTS

Fla. 1st DCA | 2007-01-31
No. 1D07-0104
BROWNING, C.J., WOLF, and KAHN, JJ., concur.
947 So. 2d 668 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2007) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. Campbell v. Lungstrum, 732 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

BROWNING, C.J., WOLF, and KAHN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ehman v. Ehman, 156 So. 3d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
    …action for trial, even where a default has been entered against a party. Because this issue was not preserved, we do not reach it. But we note that the failure to comply with rule 12.440(a) could result in a [*9] reversal. See Merrigan v. Merrigan, 947 So. 2d 668, 670 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). On remand, because the default was properly entered against the Husband, all well-pleaded facts are deemed admitted and relief specifically prayed for is acquiesced to. See Baricchi v. Barry, 2014 WL 185203, 39 Fla. L. Week…
  • Korman v. Shapiro (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)
    …015) (“Finally, pursuant to Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.440(a), the trial court—not former husband—‘was required to enter an order setting the action for trial.’” (quoting in part Teelucksingh, 21 So. 3d at 37)); Merrigan v. Merrigan, 947 So. 2d 668, 670 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“This notice also failed to comply with 4 the procedures required by Florida Rule of Family Law Procedure 12.440(a) for setting a trial or final hearing. This alone merits reversal.”); Masiello v. Masiello, 850 So. 2d…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw