CHRISTOPHER MOORE, APPELLANT,
v.
COUNTY OF MADISON, ET AL., APPELLEES
CHRISTOPHER MOORE, APPELLANT,
COUNTY OF MADISON, ET AL., APPELLEES
947 So. 2d 1189
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fox v. Harris, 773 So. 2d 107, 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“We reject [the appellant’s] claim that reversal is warranted because the circuit court did not grant him leave to amend, since he fails to show that he asked for and was denied the opportunity to amend his complaint.”). See also Palm AFC Holdings, Inc. v. Minto Cmtys., Inc., 766 So. 2d 436, 437 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding “that the words ‘with prejudice’ are” unnecessary to make “a dismissal for failure to state a cause of action ... [a final] adjudication on the merits”).
WEBSTER, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Washington v. State, 200 So. 3d 1287 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)…elief or the motion or claim is legally insufficient and that in reviewing a trial court’s summary denial of a postconviction claim, the factual allegations must be accepted as true to the extent they are not refuted by the record); Massie v. State, 947 So. 2d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (stating that the summary denial of a postconviction motion is improper where the trial court did not provide record attachments refuting the defendant’s claim). Our reversal is limited to Count 3 given that Count 1 was dis…
Authorities Cited
- Palm AFC Holdings, Inc. v. Minto Cmtys., Inc., 766 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
- FOX v. Harris, 773 So. 2d 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)