RICARDO JOSE DAVILA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RICARDO JOSE DAVILA, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
948 So. 2d 931
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Clark v. State, 943 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2006).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Total Rehab & Med. Ctrs., Inc., 123 So. 3d 1162 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…levant or privileged information was sought from the attorney, attorneys are not per se exempt from the reach of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.810(a), which allows the taking of the deposition of any person. See Marbulk Shipping, Inc. v. Bhagat, 948 So. 2d 931, 932 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Somarriba v. Ali, 941 So. 2d 526, 528, n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Young, Stern, & Tannenbaum, P.A. v. Smith, 416 So. 2d 4, 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). As the trial court retains authority under Rule 1.310(c)(d) to prohibit inquiry o…
-
Davila v. State, 26 So. 3d 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…legal sentence filed on September 23, 2005 under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The rule 3.800(a) motion is not at issue in this appeal, as it had previously been denied and [*7] that denial was affirmed by this court. Davila v. State, 948 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). .The defendant also argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise this issue in the trial court, and argues that the special jury instruction obtained by the State regarding this issue constitutes fundamenta…
Authorities Cited
- Clark v. State, 943 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)