A.M., A CHILD, PETITIONER,
v.
KEVIN HOUSEL, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE ST. LUCIE REGIONAL JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A child detained in juvenile custody sought habeas corpus relief challenging his continued detention past his 19th birthday. The Florida appellate court granted the petition, holding that the trial court's jurisdiction automatically terminated when the child reached age 19 and the court's failure to act on the Department's release notice within 10 days constituted a deemed grant of the release request.
The trial court's jurisdiction automatically terminated on the child's 19th birthday under Florida Statutes section 985.201(4)(a), and the court's failure to accept or reject the Department's release request within 10 days of notice constituted a deemed grant of the request under section 985.231(1)(d), entitling the child to release.
[1] A court's jurisdiction over a juvenile in delinquency cases generally ends when the juvenile reaches 19 years of age, unless the court formally relinquishes jurisdiction…
[2] A juvenile is entitled to release from secure detention upon reaching the age of 19, absent specific statutory provisions allowing for the extension of jurisdiction.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Section 985.201(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2005), grants jurisdiction to the circuit court, in child delinquency cases, 'until the child reaches 19 years of age' or until the court relinquishes jurisdiction prior to the 19th birthday.”
Establishes the automatic termination of jurisdiction at age 19 absent statutory exceptions
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA child was committed to the Department of Juvenile Justice on October 5, 2006, for placement in a high-risk residential program until his 19th birthd…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Termination Of Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The petitioner sought habeas corpus relief claiming continued custody in secure detention past his 19th birthday was illegal. We agreed and issued an order granting the petition and commanding the respondent to release the child. This opinion explains why the child was entitled to release. The lower court, on October 5, 2006, entered a disposition order after the child admitted to violating community control or probation. The disposition order committed the child to the Department of Juvenile Justice for placement in a high risk residential program until child’s 19th birthday. It appears the Department could not place the child in a level 8 program. On January 1, 2007, the child was to turn 19 years old, so the Department filed a notice that jurisdiction over the child would end on that date and recommended release. The notice was dated December 29, 2006.
On December 29, 2006, the lower court refused to act on the notice, instructing the clerk to strike the hearing from the docket. On January 2, 2007, the lower court again refused to act, instead noting the child had not received the treatment that was expected in the disposition order. In an effort to prevent the child from becoming a defendant in the adult criminal justice system, the judge concluded by stating: “over the objection of the defense, I’m not going to do anything at this point in time.” This petition for habeas corpus relief followed.
Section 985.201(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2005), grants jurisdiction to the circuit court, in child delinquency cases, “until the child reaches 19 years of age” or until the court relinquishes jurisdiction prior to the 19th birthday. There are exceptions, as described in sections 985.31 and 985.313,1 Florida Statutes, but neither apply in this case as the lower court did not make the findings necessary for extending jurisdiction beyond the child’s 19th birthday. As such, jurisdiction of the lower court ended on January 1, 2007, and the child was entitled to be released.
Despite notice by the Department, presumptively given on December 28, 2006, the judge decided to “do nothing.” In accordance with section 985.231(l)(d), Florida Statutes, the lower court’s refusal to “accept or reject the [Department’s] request” for release, “within 10 days after receipt of the notice” acts as a granting of the request. Because the court’s refusal to act within 10 days after receiving notice “shall be deemed” as granting the request for relief, the Department was authorized to release the child without further court order. § 985.231(l)(d), Fla. Stat. Petition G'ranted.
POLEN, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur. . Sections 985.31 and 985.313, Florida Statutes, were renumbered, effective January 1, 2007, to sections 985.47 and 985.465, respectively, without any substantive changes.