R.F., THE FATHER, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE
R.F., THE FATHER, APPELLANT,
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE
949 So. 2d 357
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Based on appellee’s concession of error, we reverse the order denying the father’s motion for reunification and terminating protective supervision for the reasons stated in H.G. v. Department of Children & Families, 916 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). We remand this case to the trial court for a determination of whether the father substantially complied with his case plan. If the father has substantially complied with his case plan and the court is satisfied that unification will not be detrimental to the child’s safety, well-being, and physical, mental, and emotional health, the court shall return the minor child to his father. See § 39.701(9)0»), Fla. Stat. (2006).
Reversed.
WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S.P. v. Fla. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 17 So. 3d 878 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…fication of the children with their mother because no competent substantial evidence in the record supported a determination that reunification would have endangered the children’s safety, well-being or health); R.F. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 949 So. 2d 357 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (reviewing denial of motion for reunification sought by appeal; reversing and remanding for specific factual finding); H.G. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 916 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (reviewing denial of motion for reun…
Authorities Cited
- H.G. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 916 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)