MARCUS HILL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BROWNING, C.J.
Appellant Marcus Hill challenges his judgment and sentence, alleging that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion to sever a count of resisting arrest without violence, and in denying his motion in limine to preclude testimony regarding his possession of a police scanner. The State concedes these points, and the concession is supported by the record on appeal and the law. See Rutherford v. State, 902 So. 2d 211, 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). The State has not demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that these errors did not contribute to the verdict. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986). Accordingly, we REVERSE Appellant’s convictions and sentences, and REMAND for a new trial.
WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Feldman v. Davis, 53 So. 3d 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…the declaratory action.” The client now appeals the trial court’s order. “The question of whether a disputed issue is subject to arbitration is a matter of contract interpretation, and our review is de novo.” Fla. Envtl. Servs., Inc. v. Rentoumis, 950 So. 2d 466, 470 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); see also Rodriguez v. Builders Firstsource—Florida, LLC, 26 So. 3d 679, 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). “[T]here are three elements for courts to consider in ruling on a motion to compel arbitration of a given dispute: (1) whethe…
-
Hospicecare OF Se. Fla., Inc. v. Malcolm Major, M.D., 968 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…th DCA 2006). The question of whether a dispute is within the scope of arbitration is a matter of contract interpretation. O’Keefe Architects, Inc. v. CED Constr. Partners, Ltd., 944 So. 2d 181, 183 (Fla.2006); Fla. Envtl. Servs., Inc. v. Rentoumis, 950 So. 2d 466, 470 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Courts must look to the intent of the parties as manifested in the contract to determine whether or not an arbitration clause compels arbitration of a particular dispute. O’Keefe Architects, Inc., 944 So. 2d at 185. Doubts…
-
Vernetti v. America-Indian Enters., Inc., 152 So. 3d 856 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…750 So. 2d at 638). “ ‘To determine whether a claim falls within the scope of an arbitration agreement, we must look beyond the legal cause of action and examine the factual allegations of the complaint.’ ” Florida Envtl. Servs., Inc. v. Rentoumis, 950 So. 2d 466, 470 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (quoting Singer v. Gaines, 896 So. 2d 851, 854 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)). Any doubt concerning the scope of an arbitration clause should be resolved in favor of arbitration. Kolsky, 28 So. 3d at 969 (citing Zager Plumbing, Inc. v.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. DiGUILIO, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986)
- Rutherford v. State, 902 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)