SC.READ, INC. AND JENNIFER FINCH, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
This appeal arose out of a proposed agency action in the form of school attendance zone redistricting in Seminole County. Appellants, S.C. Read, Inc. and Jennifer Finch, as parent, legal guardian and next friend of Christopher Brady (collectively “Appellants”), appeal the administrative law judge’s final order dismissing their second amended petition/request for determination of invalidity of proposed rule. We find no reversible error and affirm. In particular, we cannot agree with Appellants’ contention that the Seminole County School Board’s policy J mandated the Board’s adoption, without change, of one of the plan alternatives selected by the core committee.
AFFIRMED.
GRIFFIN, PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Standard Jury Instructions IN Crim. Cases-Report NO. 2007-5, 982 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 2008)…ction was adopted in 1997 [697 So. 2d 84] and amended in 2008. . We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. . One of the comments filed with this Court raised the issue of whether Judge Benton’s dissenting opinion in Cliett v. State, 951 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007), warrants amendments to instruction 15.1 (Robbery). Judge Benton asserted that "the failure to instruct the jury that it had to determine whether what [Cliett] said and did would have placed a reasonable person in fear ... was f…
-
Duphesio Thomas and Randell R. Colston v. State, 989 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…determining whether a victim was put in fear in the course of a taking, the question is whether the circumstances surrounding the incident would cause a reasonable person to be afraid, not whether the victim was actually afraid. See Cliett v. State, 951 So. 2d 3, 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Magnotti v. State, 842 So. 2d 963, 965 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Woods v. State, 769 So. 2d 501, 502 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); State v. Baldwin, 709 So. 2d 636, 637 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). The facts surrounding the offenses at issue, as te…
-
Zairon Jarquis Fussell v. State, 154 So. 3d 1233 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…determining whether a victim was put in fear in the course of a taking, the question is whether the circumstances surrounding the incident would cause a reasonable person to be afraid, not whether the victim was actually afraid. See Cliett v. State, 951 So. 2d 3, 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).... The facts surrounding the offenses at issue, as testified to by the victim identified in Count I, would cause, as the jury found, a reasonable person to be afraid. As such, it matters not that the victim identified in Coun…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence