CHAD PIFER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
ALTENBERND, J., Concurs with opinion.
ALTENBERND, Judge,
Concurring.
I concur in the affirmance of the eighteen judgments and seventeen sentences on appeal in this case. An Anders1 brief was filed in this case, and we have located no reversible error. The trial judge, however, should be advised that no probation order was ever rendered in case number 2005-CF-2488, even though drug probation was the announced sentence. It appears to be the only case in which probation was imposed. Thus, unless an order is rendered, it is doubtful that Mr. Pifer will actually be placed on probation when his prison sentence is completed.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Matrix Emp. Leasing & Fcic/First Commercial Claim Servs. v. Leopoldo Hernandez, 975 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…atutes. “When the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous and conveys a clear and definite meaning, there is no occasion for resorting to the rules of statutory interpretation and construction.” James W. Windham Builders, Inc. v. Overloop, 951 So. 2d 40, 42 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). “The statute must be given its plain and obvious meaning.” Id. (citing McLaughlin v. State, 721 So. 2d 1170, 1172 (Fla.1998)). Although both parties argue the statute in question is clear and unambiguous, their interpretatio…
-
Pifer v. State, 59 So. 3d 225 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…e cases involving burglary, dealing in stolen property, grand theft, possession of paraphernalia, and resisting arrest without violence. Pifer was adjudicated guilty and sentenced. The judgments and sentences were affirmed on appeal. Pifer v. State, 951 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). In February 2008, Pifer filed a motion to correct illegal sentence, which was summarily denied. Pifer appealed the summary denial of his motion, and this court reversed and remanded for reconsideration. Pifer v. State, 8 So. 3d…
-
Jones v. Food Lion, Inc., 202 So. 3d 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)…(affirming JCC’s denial of permanent total disability benefits as premature for time period prior to date of maximum medical improvement). Accordingly, we affirm the JCC’s conclusion in result only. See James W. Windham Builders, Inc. v. Overloop, 951 So. 2d 40, 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“If a trial court reaches the right result,' but for the wrong reasons, it will be upheld if there is any basis to support the judgment in the record. Dade County Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638, 644 (Fla.1999…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)