ALLANGSON BRUNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2007-03-14
No. 4D07-324
POLEN, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.
951 So. 2d 980 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2007) Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). We affirm without prejudice to defendant filing a rule 1.540(a) motion to correct a scrivener’s error. See Wells v. State, 796 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

POLEN, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hickey v. Burlinson, 33 So. 3d 827 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
    …v. Peyton, 9 So. 3d 670, 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (stating, “[W]e are comfortable that non-final orders determining visitation in family law cases are reviewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii).... ”); Cuartas v. Cuartas, 951 So. 2d 980, 981, n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (accepting jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii) of an order denying former husband’s motion for contempt and for immediate change of primary residence); Drago v. Drago, 895 So. 2d 529, 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 200…
  • Ocean Bank v. Caribbean Towers Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 121 So. 3d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
    …0, serves as a procedural bar to a party requesting relief outside the pleadings in almost all circumstances, but it does not implicate a court’s subject matter jurisdiction. Not being jurisdictional, this argument can be waived. Cuartas v. Cuartas, 951 So. 2d 980, 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“As with most rules, a litigant can waive the benefit of the rule.”). We decline to rule on the issue of whether the Bank was procedurally barred from requesting post-judgment relief because we hold that the Association wai…
  • Clark v. Clark, 204 So. 3d 589 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
    …of which require reversal. First, because the Former Husband sought to change the status quo by terminating his alimony obligation, the motion was effectively a modification proceeding that could not be initiated by motion. See Cuartas v. Cuartas, 951 So. 2d 980, 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (citing Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110(h); Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.110). Instead, the proceeding had to be initiated by a supplemental petition with proper service of process. See Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.070(a); Cuartas, 951 So. 2d at 983 (“I…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw