FRANK RAFAEL ENRIQUEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, ETC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2007-04-04
No. 3D06-2379
Before RAMIREZ, SHEPHERD, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
952 So. 2d 1241 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2007)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The appellate court reversed the trial court's order barring future filings because the appellant was not afforded due process.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant alleged improper conditional release while under the Jimmy Ryce Act. The trial court denied his petition and barred him from future filings.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Frank Rafael Enriquez, appeals a trial court order denying an Emergency Petition for Writ of Prohibition or Temporary Injunction. In the petition, Enriquez alleged he was improperly placed on conditional release while simultaneously confined under the Jimmy Ryce Act.1 In the body of the order denying the Emergency Petition, the trial court also “barred [Enriquez] from filing any future petitions for extraordinary relief in Florida courts.” Enriquez appeals only that portion of the order prohibiting future filings.

Upon review of the record, we reverse that portion of the order barring Enriquez from further filings on the ground that it was entered without affording Enriquez due process to show cause why such an order should not be entered. See Jordan v. State, 760 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).2

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

. § 394.910, Fla. Stat. (2003).

. The trial court's order additionally purports to prevent Enriquez from filing any pleading or petition in any case in any circuit court throughout the entire state of Florida. Because we reverse on other reasons, we need not determine the propriety of this blanket bar.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw