1501 SE 24TH ROAD, LLC, ETC., APPELLANT,

v.

THE ESTATE OF PALMA PASQUALINI, ETC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Tamera Fletcher v. Huntington Place Ltd. P'ship, 952 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …n Gainesville Health Care Center, Inc. v. Weston, 857 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Stokes, however, is the law of this district and has been followed by this court in at least one other case, 1501 SE 24-th Road, LLC v. Estate of Palma Pasqualini, 953 So. 2d 13, 2007 WL 529827 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb. 13, 2007). Additionally, Weston does not address the issue decided in Stokes. Huntington contends that the severability clause in subsection X(A) of their Admissions Agreement allows this court to sever the langua…
• Arvita M. Coleman v. Bland, 152 So. 3d 752 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
  …r of the "prevailing party” unless the court orders otherwise. Therefore, in determining whether to award appellate costs, the trial court must decide whether Former Wife was the "prevailing party” on the primary appeal. See, e.g., Markin v. Markin, 953 So. 2d 13, 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (reversing award of appellate costs in favor of former husband who prevailed on an issue, but not "the significant issues” on appeal).…
• Deutsche Bank v. Quintela, 268 So. 3d 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)
  …e fact that the Bank was able to obtain a final judgment of foreclosure without having to reform the legal description of the property shows that the reformation count was insignificant “in the scheme of this particular case.” See Markin v. Markin, 953 So. 2d 13, 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (holding that a party did not prevail where he “obtained no relief from the total amount he was required to pay, let alone relief that could be classified as significant”); see also Salam, 233 So. 3d at 475. For these reason…

Authorities Cited

• Sa-Pg-Ocala, LLC v. Stokes, 935 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)